THE EFFECTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND ACADEMIC ABILITY TO BIOLOGY LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT
Abstract
The research was conducted at SMA Negeri 5 Metro on June 14 until September 30, 2017. Variables of research X1 (STAD and TGT), X2 (Upper and Lower Academic Abilities), Y (Biological Cognitive Learning Outcomes) Experimental Design of Factorial 2 x 2. Sample 56, STAD 28 students, TGT 28 students, was classified based on upper and lower academic ability. Sapling technique stratified random sampling. Documentation and test data collection model. Technique of data analysis of 2 path Anova as further test, previously conducted independent t test and paired t test.Result of a nalysis of research data concluded there is no difference between mean of cognitive biology learning result in group of STAD and TGT value of Sig (2-tailed) equal to 0,689 > 0,05. There is no difference between the mean of biological cognitive learning outcomes in groups of learners capable of upper and lower Sig (2- tailed) values of 0.891 > 0.05. There is no difference in the results of cognitive biology study using STAD and TGT model on students who have high academic ability, Sig 0.854 (p > 0,05).
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisyah J. Nur. (2007). Sampling
Technique. Elearning Clinic Education Stage Health Sciences Society. (IKM). Yogyakarta: Faculty of Medicine Universitas Islam Indonesia.Http://www.medicine.uii.ac.id
Arikunto, Suharsimi.(2006). Research
Procedures Revised Edition VI.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ayup Darmawan, I Putu and Edi
Sujoko.(2013). Revised Taxonomic Learning Benyamin S. Bloom.Journal of Satya Widya, Vol 29, No. 1. June 2013: 30-39.
Azizahwati. (2009). Application of
Mastery Learning Strategies to Describe Learning Outcomes Student of Physics Education Study Program of FKIP UNRI in Mathematics Physics course 1. Geliga Science Journal 3 (2), 29-33, 2009. ISSN 1978-502X.
Bachtiar. (2016). Differences in Student
Learning Outcomes Using Cooperative Learning Model Type STAD, NHT and TGT on the Concept of Human Circulatory System. Thesis is not published. Jakarta Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Bahri, Arsad and Andi Asmawati Azis
and Nur Fadilah Amin. (2012). Implementation of Learning Strategy Active Question Student Have and Academic Ability to Cognitive Learning Outcomes Grade VIII Students SMP N 2 Camba. Journal of Sainsmart, March 2012, pages 41-51.ISSN 2086-8755.
Erina, Richie. Et. (2015). Complainer of
Learning Model in STAD to Process Skills Science and Learning Outcomes of Cognitive Physics In High School. Journal of Inovasi Pendidikan IPA. (On line) volume 1 - number 2, October 2015, (202-211). (http://jurnal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi. Accessible October 15, 2016).
Gusniar. Aplikasi saka Cooperative
Learning Model Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) dala Ngapikake Hasil Pembelajaran Mahasiswa ing Kelas IPS Subjek IVN SDN. 2 Ogoamas II. Jurnal
Creative Tadulako Onine Vol. 2 No.1 ISSN 2354-614X.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2009). Teaching and
Learning Process. Jakarta: PT
Bumi Aksara.
Huda, Miftahul. (2015). Cooperative
Learning "Methods, Techniques, Structures and Implementation Models". Printed X. Yogyakarta: Student Literature.
Karwono. (2007). The Influence of
Feedback
And Locus of Control on Ability
Student Students in Managing Micro-Learning. Unpublished dissertation. Jakarta: Post Graduate of Jakarta State University.
Kunandar. (2008). Easy Step Classroom
Action Research As Teacher Profession Development. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Muhfahroyin.(2009). Pengaruh Strategi
Think Pair Share (TPS) dan Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa SMA di Kota Metro. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, Volume 16, Nomor 2, Oktober 2009.
Rohmiyati K, Dwi. (2011). Comparison
of Mathematics Learning Outcomes between Students Given STAD Method
and TGT Class VIII MTs Negeri Sumberagung Jetis Bantul. Thesis.UNY: Education FMIPA Mathematics
Sudarti. (2015). Improved Learning
Achievement Ips Through Team Games Tournament (Tgt) In Class V Sd Country 1 Gemaharjo District Watulimo Trenggalek District. professional education journals, VOLUME 4, NO. 2, AUGUST 2015.
Sugiyono. (2011). Qualitative
Quantitative Research Methods and R & D. Cet-13. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Slavin, Robert E. (2005). Cooperative
Learning, Theory, Research, and
Practice (translator: Nurulita
Yusron). Bandung: Publisher Nusa Media.
Sujarwanta, Agus. (2015). Initiating
Problems and Testing Hypotheses in Correlation Research. Metro: Research Institute of UM Metro Press.
Usman, Moh. Uzer. (2007). Menjadi
Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wulandari D, Sri. (2015). Teori Belajar
Konstruktivis Piaget Dan Vygotsky. Jurnal: Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education Volume 2 Nomor 3 Tahun 2015. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.org. ISSN 2407-7925.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/jlpp.v4i1.958
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Dwi Noviawan, Karwono Karwono, Handoko Santoso
View My Stats

Jurnal Lentera Pendidikan by Pusat Penelitian LPPM UM METRO is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.