Changes in Colonial Labor Policy Post-Chinese Workers' Uprising in Wanayasa 1832

Misbahudin Misbah

Abstract


This article explores the transformation of colonial labor policy in the Dutch East Indies following the rebellion of Chinese workers at the Wanayasa tea plantation in 1832. Triggered by exploitative labor practices, including irregular wages, forced labor, and the absence of formal contracts, the uprising marked a turning point in labor governance under colonial rule. The research employs a historical-sociological method, supported by Ted Robert Gurr’s theory of Relative Deprivation, to examine the structural inequalities that led to collective resistance. Primary sources include colonial archives, local manuscripts, and autobiographical reports from colonial officials. The study finds that the rebellion pressured the colonial government to issue the Governor-General’s Decree of 1833, introducing formal labor contracts and a more structured wage system. While implementation remained inconsistent, this marked the beginning of a shift from informal exploitation to regulated labor relations. The article contributes a novel perspective by combining historical narrative with social theory to highlight the agency of marginalized labor groups in shaping colonial policy. It also offers new insights into the roots of labor consciousness and early worker mobilization in Indonesia’s colonial context.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adriana, I. (2016). Pengaruh efikasi diri dan kemandirian belajar terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 539–548. Jakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI.

Cohen Stuart, C. P. (1924). Dalam Gedenkboek der Nederlandsch Indische Theecultuur (1824– 1924). Batavia: Koloniaal Instituut.

Deenik, A. C. (1927). Aanvullingen op Babad Pasoendan djeung Ringkesan Babad Hindia.

Bandung: Balai Pustaka.

Ekadjati, E. S. (2000). Wawacan Carita Perang Cina di Tanjungpura. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Leonard. (2013). Peran kemampuan berpikir lateral dan positif terhadap prestasi belajar evaluasi pendidikan. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(1), 54–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v5i1.1259

Mursidi, A. (2015). Wacana kuasa dan hegemoni: Kiai pada sekolah menengah atas negeri kolaborasi dengan pondok pesantren. Jurnal Vidya Samhita, 1(1). http://www.ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/vs/article/view/3

Nurosyifah. (2022). Pemberontakan pekerja Tionghoa di Perkebunan Teh Wanayasa Purwakarta, 1832. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Serière, G. de. (1849). Mijne loopbaan in Indië. Den Haag: Mouton & Co.

Soekaboomische Landbouw Vereeniging. (1914). Geschiedkundig overzicht van de thee cultuur. Amsterdam: SLV.

Sulistyo, B. (2010). Pasang surut gerakan buruh Indonesia. Jurnal Sejarah Sosial, 5(2).

Van der Chijs, A. (1892). Geschiedenis van de gouvernements thee-cultuur op Java. Leiden: Brill. Peristiwa Chinesetroubelen di Batavia: Sebuah tinjauan sejarah hukum. (2011). Jurnal

Hukum dan Masyarakat, 8(1).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/sd.v9i2.4321

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 SWARNADWIPA: Jurnal Kajian Sejarah, Sosial, Budaya, dan Pembelajarannya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.